Seems to me that PJM sounds rather jealous of the Roman practice for sending Christians against lions in the Coloseum. I would figure PJM is an acronym for the generic "Pajamas Media" service... if so, this is a huge disappointment. You really have to make a stretch, and dislike Catholicism to interpret the article linked this way. The lead in to the article is as follows, and pretty much sums up said interpretation: A Vatican official reportedly called for a boycott of the upcoming "The Da Vinci Code" film Friday, saying it contained "slanderous" offenses against Christianity that would have provoked a worldwide revolt had they been directed against Islam or the Holocaust. OK... let's see here. The film contains slanderous offenses against Christianity... this is fact. If this movie were denying the Holocaust it would have provoked worldwide outrage... while less likely today than it would have been 50 years ago, this statement is likely true. Filmakers fear making provacative films about Islam (as major American and other media corporations fear putting shows on the air that may "offend" Muslims) so it's hard to say exactly what might happen, though I'm sure it would involve much violence. So it appears as though Monsignor Angelo Amato is using the word "revolt" to describe 3 different scenarios in a way that does not indicate violence, but rather vocal opposition. Shame PJM for a quick, petty shot at Catholicism.